There’s a lot of noise in recruitment at the moment. Efficiency mandates handed down from on-high. Candidates using ChatGPT. Recruiters worrying about being replaced by ChatGPT. Vendors claiming AI will solve everything while everyone wonders whether anybody else knows what they’re doing.
Against that chaos, it’s easy for talent acquisition to shrink – to become reactive; to keep our heads safely under the parapet.
In episode 16 of The View, Heidi King-Underwood, Global Principal Talent Acquisition Lead at Sonatype, makes the case for the opposite. Recruiters, she argues, need to become braver. More visible. More strategic. More willing to challenge. Unapologetically human.
- Keep reading to learn:
- Why recruiters need to stop acting like order-takers
- How TA can earn – and take – a true strategic voice
- Why operational overload is crushing recruitment teams
- How AI is making everyone anxious
- Why candidate surveillance won’t age well
- How AI ethics and DEI are starting to collide
- Why bravery is becoming a core skill for TA leaders
Let’s dig in.
For the full conversation, watch the video here:
Talent acquisition should do the telling, not do as they’re told
Most recruiters have butted up against the frustration of being treated like an order-taker. A role opens, and raised voices start to fly wildly from every corner.
- The manager wants a unicorn, yesterday.
- Other managers want to know where their unicorn is.
- Finance wants costs DOWN.
- Leaders want the same, but results have to go UP.
- Candidates want clarity (often while giving you none).
And you’re meant to make the impossible happen. Spin every plate without dropping anything, and – whatever you do – don’t rock the boat. No wonder recruiters are burning out. It’s an impossible task.
But good recruiters aren’t there just to take orders. As Heidi points out, “Talent acquisition isn’t just there to fill roles. It’s about partnering with the business; understanding needs; negotiating; resetting expectations”.
Heidi’s talking to the age-old issue, of recruitment earning a seat at the table. Or taking we should say. Because sitting around waiting for leadership to realise recruitment’s value without doing anything to prove it isn’t useful.
If people finders want a seat at the table, that’s on us – to start raising our voices; to be willing to make waves; to build our communities and grow our capabilities and confidence.
(That’s also something Matt Burney, Senior Strategic Advisor at Indeed, spoke to us about recently, calling for recruiters to stop complaining about being the forgotten child of the business and start mastering the skill of articulating value through storytelling. Excellent read, if you haven’t already.)
As Heidi puts it, earning a strategic voice means being willing to challenge leadership constructively, with data, context and – crucially – solutions.
Read more: How recruiters can master stakeholder management
There’s an old improv principle – “yes, and” not “no, but”. The same applies here. Not “no but this won’t work. More “and here’s what we’re seeing in the market. And here’s the risk. And here’s a better way forward.” Heidi says:
Don’t speak for the sake of it, obviously. But leaders do listen; they do see when you’re adding value. They know talent is your wheelhouse, not theirs. Don’t underestimate your influence.
Recruiters have an invaluable perspective, sitting between the business and the market. But often that’s going to waste, because recruiters have learned to be good, be quiet, and deliver what they’re told.
The best TA teams are good and they do deliver. But they’re not quiet and they do the telling as much as they’re told. That’s their strategic value, and that’s what good leaders actively want from the people they hire.
Strategic teams need strategic tools.
Standing your ground as a strategic value-add partner is one thing. But recruitment can’t add value without the right tools and support.
Many recruiters are trapped in operational overload, battling too much admin, too much firefighting, too many systems, too many vacancies, and too many impossible expectations.
You can’t operate strategically if your entire day is swallowed by process friction; if you’re buried under spreadsheets and endlessly chasing managers for feedback.
AI anxiety: Big Brother isn’t a good look
AI recruitment discourse is… shall we say, hypey? Candidates are using AI. Recruiters are using AI. Organisations are experimenting with AI. Vendors are embedding AI everywhere.
But amid all that activity, there’s a heap of anxiety.
AI is all still so new. Nobody really knows what they’re doing. Best-practices are still being defined. Everyone’s worried about everything while peeping over fence at everyone else claiming they’ve got a handle on things.
- Candidates worry about being penalised for using AI tools…
- …but also about AI creating bias.
- Recruiters worry about screening becoming impossible…
- … but also about finding new ways to hit ever-receding goals.
- Employers worry about fairness and compliance…
- …but also about missing the efficiency dividend and falling behind peers.
Heidi talks about the need to reconnect to empathy in how we show up for candidates. Yes, “build a rigorous internal process and a rigorous external-facing AI policy you can provide candidates. And then, lead with empathy.”
These anxieties are one reason Tribepad became the first-ever UK ATS to become Warden Assured, to give leaders and recruiters confidence that they’re moving fairly, not just fast.
It’s also why we’re a founding member of the Association of Recruitment Technology Providers. Because innovation is brilliant – but absolutely needs ethical safeguards to make sure it’s a force for good.
Anxiety leads to awful, controlling behaviour like screen monitoring. Empathy leads to open, compassionate conversations about why someone’s using AI and how we can better support them.
The problem isn’t candidates using AI to improve applications. Of course they are. If technology can help someone communicate more clearly, overcome dyslexia, reduce anxiety, or present themselves more confidently, why wouldn’t they use it? Wouldn’t you?
As Heidi says, “AI isn’t going anywhere. But it’s there to complement us, as humans.” We can’t bury our heads in the sand about this. And Big-Brother type candidate surveillance won’t age well.
We need to learn to play nicely with this new shiny tool that has the potential to help us all. Not jealously ringfence it for our side.
How AI ethics will touch DEI
One of the most fascinating points (of an all-round fascinating discussion) was Heidi’s comments on AI ethics and inclusion.
We all know that the environment around DEI is increasingly challenging, with organisations retreating publicly from inclusion commitments, and nervousness about potential political backlash.
But stepping backwards creates its own risks, because inclusive recruitment isn’t just an ethical issue.
When organisations narrow hiring criteria, create inaccessible processes or fail to build psychologically safe environments, they shrink talent pools and hurt brand reputation – right when skills shortages are intensifying.
And AI adds another layer of complexity here. As Heidi says:
There’s a crucial conversation about the way we breed inclusion internally, and AI’s role within that. If we say, ‘no, you can’t use AI’, it fundamentally changes the way we create an equitable environment
Different people will use technology differently depending on confidence, communication styles, neurodiversity, educational background, or generational familiarity with AI tools.
Blanket bans and too-rigid policies might unintentionally exclude people who may perform brilliantly in-role; or unintentionally hamper someone who would perform brilliantly, but you’ve taken away the tools that help them do that.
That doesn’t mean ‘anything goes’. Of course organisations need fairness, governance and clear expectations when it comes to AI. But it demands nuance and flexibility:
If we want to build a truly inclusive environment, we have to remember that people’s needs from tech is different. And they’ll want to feel nurtured to engage with the tech in the ways they’re comfortable with.
Let’s build our collective bravery
The thread running through everything Heidi talks about is bravery.
- Bravery to have challenging conversations instead of nodding silently.
- Bravery to experiment with responsible AI instead of closing the door.
- Bravery to protect inclusion despite political and commercial pressure.
- Bravery to stand for something; to put yourself out there.
- Bravery to build your network, even when you’re nervous.
- Bravery to be “unapologetically authentic in yourself”.
The interesting thing is what a deeply, profoundly human capability bravery is.
One of the most common anxieties about AI is that it’s somehow coming for our humanity. But this is a powerful reminder that the reverse is true. That human capacities; human judgement; human empathy becomes more important, when more is automated.
AI doesn’t mean automating away recruitment’s humanity. It’s the opportunity to automate away the admin, so you can amp up the humanity where it counts. So you can do more of what you love.
Heidi herself is a great example – she has such palpable passion for recruitment; such infectious zest and energy for what we’re all doing here. It’s a reminder that the tools and technologies we use might change, but the heart of everything’s still the same: people, doing their best to change lives for other people.
That’s a mission we can get behind.
Tribepad is the trusted tech ally to smart(er) recruiters everywhere. Combining ATS, CRM, assessment, video screening, compliance, onboarding, analytics and a fully-integrated AI assistant, our talent acquisition software is a springboard for fairer, faster, better recruitment for everyone.
B-Corp certified and multiple-award-winning (like Best ATS for Enterprises and Tech Company of the Year), Tribepad is trusted by organisations like Hotel Chocolat, cardfactory, Greggs, Tesco, Subway, DFS, Met Office, and Home Bargains.
FAQs
What does it mean for talent acquisition to be strategic?
Strategic talent acquisition means going beyond simply filling vacancies. Strategic TA teams influence workforce planning, challenge unrealistic hiring expectations, improve candidate experience, shape employer brand, and use market insight and data to guide business decisions.
Why do recruiters struggle to get a seat at the table?
Recruiters are often trapped in operational overload – battling admin, fragmented systems, hiring pressure, and endless stakeholder demands. That leaves little time for strategic thinking or value storytelling, making TA look reactive instead of commercially influential.
How can recruiters become more strategic?
Recruiters become more strategic by:
- Bringing market insight and data into leadership conversations
- Challenging constructively instead of simply taking orders
- Improving stakeholder management
- Using recruitment technology to reduce admin
- Connecting hiring outcomes to wider business goals
How is AI changing recruitment?
AI is reshaping recruitment across sourcing, screening, candidate communications, interview preparation, analytics, and admin automation. Candidates are also increasingly using AI tools to improve applications and prepare for interviews.
Should candidates be allowed to use AI in job applications?
Many recruiters and organisations are moving towards a more balanced approach to AI use. Rather than banning AI outright, employers are increasingly focusing on fairness, transparency, and understanding how candidates use AI tools responsibly and authentically.
Why are recruiters worried about AI?
Recruiters are facing growing anxiety around:
- Higher application volumes
- Generic AI-written applications
- Screening challenges
- Bias and compliance risks
- Pressure to adopt AI quickly
- Fear of falling behind competitors
At the same time, many teams are still figuring out what “good” AI usage actually looks like.
What are the risks of AI surveillance in recruitment?
Overly controlling approaches like screen monitoring or aggressive AI detection risk damaging candidate trust and creating poor experiences. They can also unintentionally disadvantage neurodivergent candidates or people using AI tools for accessibility support.
How does AI affect diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)?
AI creates both opportunities and risks for DEI. AI tools can improve accessibility, communication and confidence for some candidates. But rigid AI policies or biased systems can also unintentionally exclude people from different backgrounds, communication styles or neurotypes.
Why is empathy still important in recruitment?
Recruitment is fundamentally human. Candidates remember how organisations make them feel. As hiring becomes more automated, empathy, communication, trust and human judgement become even more important differentiators for recruiters and employers.
What skills do recruiters need for the future?
Modern recruiters increasingly need skills like:
- Commercial awareness
- Stakeholder management
- Confidence and influence
- AI literacy
- Data-driven decision-making
- Communication and storytelling
- Empathy and emotional intelligence
- Strategic thinking
The future of TA belongs to recruiters who can combine technology with humanity.