Nailing recruitment data: turn hiring numbers into business impact

Recruitment data is only useful when it’s connected, trusted, and used to steer decisions. This guide shows senior TA leaders how to cut through noise, prove value, and move from reactive reporting to strategic influence. 

Recruitment is under relentless pressure. Talent shortages are biting, budgets are tightening, and the pace of change is accelerating. Every hire matters. Not just to fill a seat, but to protect productivity, fuel growth, and strengthen culture.

But too often, recruitment teams are flying blind. 

• Recruitment data is collected but not connected.
• Metrics are measured but not meaningful.
• Insights exist but are not influencing decisions.  

You’ve got the recruitment reports, sure. But do you trust the data? Does it tell you anything you can act on? Does it help you win budget or change minds?

For most organisations, the honest answer is no. That’s a big missed opportunity.

Done well, recruitment data isn’t just a reporting tool. It’s a strategic superpower – your most powerful weapon to prove value, unlock resources, and make smarter hiring decisions. 

Recruitment data can help you:

• Prove recruitment’s value in pounds and productivity
• Gain clarity when changes snarl up how hiring happens 
• Grow confidence when leaders push for ROI
• Build influence at the table when strategy’s being set

Good recruitment reporting is how you shift recruitment from a ‘cost centre’ to a driver of business success.

That’s where this guide comes in. Keep reading to learn:

• What recruitment data really means (beyond surface metrics)
• The huge range of recruitment data TA teams might collect
• Why many teams struggle to use their hiring data effectively
• A recruitment data maturity model to benchmark where you are today 
• Practical next best steps to start using data for fairer, faster, better hiring

What recruitment data really means

When most people hear “recruitment data”, they think about the basics: time-to-hire; application volume; number of interviews, etc. Those metrics are useful to know, sure. But on their own, they’re just numbers. Raw data, not real insight. They don’t explain why things happen, or what you should do about it.

The real power of recruitment data and reporting comes when you move:

• From activity to visibility. Not just “how many days did this hire take,” but “where did delays happen?”
• From siloed reports to accountability. Not just “we spent X on job boards,” but “which sources actually delivered successful hires?”
• From snapshots to stories. Not just “what happened last month,” but “how are we trending over time, and what does that mean for next quarter?”

It’s like turning the lights on in a dark room. You stop tripping over the furniture and start moving with confidence.

Let’s talk briefly about the different types of recruitment data TA teams might be collecting. 

Types of recruitment data across the hiring process

Every stage of the hiring process generates data (at least with online e-recruitment, where everything’s tracked). Before we start talking about making more data-driven hiring decisions, let’s ground the conversation in the day-to-day reality of what you could be collecting. 

Attraction and sourcing

• Job advert views
• Click-through rates (CTR) on job ads
• Careers site traffic (unique visitors, bounce rate, time on page)
• Source-of-traffic (job boards, social, referrals, direct)
• Cost per click / cost per application
• Employer brand sentiment (Glassdoor scores, social mentions)
• Talent pool demographics
• Talent pool engagement rate
• Recruitment marketing metrics

Application

• Application volume (overall; by role; by geography; etc)
• Application completion rate / drop-off rate
• Application abandonment reasons (form length, technical issues)
• Average time to complete application
• Candidate demographics (for DEI monitoring)
• Use of assistive tech like screen readers in applications

Screening and shortlisting

• Candidate assessment metrics (completion rate; time to completion; scores)
• Pre-screen interview conversion rates
• Number of candidates rejected at each screening stage
• Anonymised application uptake
• Time taken per recruiter to review candidates
• Video screening metrics 

Interview

• Interview-to-offer ratio
• Average time in interview stage
• Average number of interviews per candidate
• Interview scheduling speed
• Candidate satisfaction with interview experience (NPS or survey)
• Hiring manager interview feedback response times
• Panel diversity metrics

Compliance and offer

• Compliance metrics (time-in-compliance; completion rate; pass/fail rate)
• Offer acceptance rate
• Number of offers rescinded or renegotiated
• Reasons for declined offers (counter-offers, salary, flexibility, etc.)
• Time from interview to offer

Onboarding and early tenure

• Time-to-start (offer accepted until day one)
• Drop-out rate between offer and start
• New hire onboarding task completion rate
• Manager onboarding task completion rate
• New hire engagement surveys
• Quality-of-hire metrics
• Early attrition rate

Overarching and strategic metrics

• Time-to-hire and time-to-fill
• Cost-per-hire (advertising; agency; recruiter time)
• Recruiting channel ROI
• Diversity representation across funnel stages
• Candidate experience metrics (net promoter score or satisfaction) 
• Recruiter and hiring manager satisfaction

This list shows recruitment data is far more than just time-to-hire. It spans the whole recruitment funnel from attraction to retention and usually touches on a whole heap of different systems.

But this complexity is one of the big reasons that talent leaders sometimes struggle to get their arms around the whole recruitment data shindig – resulting in data that clutters, rather than data that clarifies. 

If recruitment reporting feels messy, inconsistent, or overwhelming in your organisation, you’re not alone. Let’s talk about why that might be happening. 

Why many TA teams struggle with recruitment data

Recruitment data analytics should give you clarity, credibility, and direction.

But the truth is, that’s not where many teams are. Time and again we have conversations with recruitment leaders who would love to use hiring data more effectively, but they’ve been hitting hurdle after hurdle. 

The global recruitment analytics market is set to grow from total revenue of $0.32 billion in 2022 to $1.09 billion by 2032 – a 241% leap. But research also shows that only 8% of large organisations describe their current people analytics capabilities as strong. 

That means nine out of ten are still wrestling with the basics – and that’s only among the big businesses. Among smaller teams, that capability is likely much lower.

Here are some of the major challenges we see. 

9 challenges using recruitment data better:

1. Fragmented tech ecosystems

TA teams often juggle multiple systems: ATS, HRIS, job boards, candidate assessment tools, background checks, onboarding platforms. 

When these don’t talk to each other, data gets siloed, duplicated, or lost.  So instead of a single source of truth, you’re left with dozens of partial pictures that don’t add up.

2. Software limitations 

Maybe your issue isn’t fragmentation. Maybe you’re not using the right recruitment software in the first place. Some smaller organisations still use spreadsheets to recruit, for instance, which isn’t designed for recruitment reporting. Likewise, many entry-level recruitment platforms for SMEs offer limited, if any, reporting and analytics functionality. 

Not much you can do to improve how you use recruitment data if you’re hamstrung by your tech. If your platform can’t answer leaders’ questions, your function looks underpowered – even when the team isn’t.

3. Data quality issues

Even when you do have recruitment data, it’s not always reliable. Inconsistent field completion, missing values, duplicate records, and manual errors undermine trust. Recruiters and hiring managers stop looking at dashboards if they’re not confident the data is accurate. Rubbish in, rubbish out. 

4. Focus on vanity metrics

It’s easy to default to the easiest numbers to pull: application volume; number of interviews; number of hires, and so on. But these don’t always connect to strategic outcomes.

Leaders care about productivity, revenue, risk, and reputation – not just funnel counts. When reporting doesn’t speak the C-suite’s language, recruitment is seen as tactical rather than strategic.

5. Data literacy gaps

Recruiters are great at relationships, sourcing, and selling opportunities but they’re not always trained in data analysis.

If those challenges resonate, let’s dive into our recruitment data maturity model to see where you are, and how to move forwards. 

How do you stack up? Recruitment data maturity model and next-best steps

It’s normal to be a bit stuck and/or overwhelmed when it comes to recruitment data. Take a look at this recruitment data maturity model and see where your team sits. 

(There are heaps of different data analytics maturity models out there – we’ve shared this one from Deloitte before, for example. The below is an amalgamation of various, based on what we see recruitment teams doing.)

You’re unlikely to fit exactly into any one stage but this should help you get a sense of where you are. And what your next best steps might be to start moving towards more consistent evidence-based, data-driven recruitment.

Stage 1: Reactive

We made 16 offers last month and hired 13 people.

What it looks like:

• Spending hours wrangling spreadsheets to get basic data
• Pulling ad-hoc reports manually when asked
• Lack of clear KPIs and priorities
• Inconsistent definitions of metrics 
• Data mainly collected for compliance, not improvement

Risks:

• Leaders see recruitment as tactical admin, not strategic partners 
• There’s no shared truth: numbers are contested or mistrusted
• Challenges getting buy-in for a step-up: it’s a mindset shift

Next best steps:

1. Decide what matters. Work with senior leaders and managers to understand which data they care about. Narrow down your priorities and what you can achieve with your current tooling. As Hung Lee pointed out recently when we spoke to him about recruitment reporting for SMEs, thinking short-term here is fine: what’s the most important thing for you over the next 12-weeks?
2. Standardise definitions. Align on core metrics and agree consistent definitions. If you want to report on quality-of-hire, what does that actually mean to you? 
3. Centralise collection. Move away from spreadsheets into a single ATS or reporting platform. You can’t measure what you can’t easily collect. At the least, get the conversation onto the table and start building your business case, even if you can’t get budget immediately. 
4. Pick starter metrics. Don’t bite off more than you can chew. Track a small handful of the metrics that matter consistently for three months to build trust in the data. 
5. Share early wins. Start to snowball recruitment reporting buy-in by showcasing your early wins. It’s important to shout about what you’re doing well, to start changing the perception of recruitment. 

Stage 2: Descriptive

We made 16 offers last month and hired 13 people; our average time-to-hire was 72 days.

What it looks like:

• Your ATS or HRIS produces basic data reports
• You can track core metrics like time-to-hire and source-of-hire
• Data is still largely descriptive: “what happened” more than “why”

Risks:

• Vanity metrics dominate. Reports exist but don’t influence behaviour
• Collecting data takes time and effort but isn’t driving real value
• There are still challenges getting buy-in for a new attitude towards data

Next best steps:

1. Segment your data. Don’t stop at the overall average. Break recruitment data down by recruiter, business unit, role family, geography, or demographic. You’ll quickly spot where processes work well and where they break down.
2. Start building time-series views. Move beyond one-off snapshots by comparing this month or quarter against the last. Direction of travel matters more than the static number.
3. Run regular reviews. Book monthly or quarterly recruitment data reviews into the diary with TA, HR, and hiring managers as a standing agenda item, not an ad hoc request. Get everyone onto the same page about the hiring metrics that matter to improve outcomes: help them connect the dots. 
4. Build recruitment data confidence. Run training for recruiters and hiring managers on how to run and interpret reports. Show them what each metric means, why it matters, and how it links to business goals.
5. Tell early stories. Even with descriptive data, you can highlight meaningful narratives. For example: “Application volume spiked by 30% last month after we trialled a new job board”. 

Stage 3: Diagnostic

We made 16 offers last month and hired 13 people. Our average time-to-hire was 72 days – driven-up by engineering roles which take 106 days because of delays at interview-to-offer. 

If we streamline the interview process to two stages, we could shorten this bottleneck and improve engineering capacity more quickly.

What it looks like:

• • Data is reliable and centralised so you can easily pull what you need
  • Reports are generated automatically and sent where they’re needed
  • You drill into data to understand why things happen
  • Recruitment can evidence the function’s value and successes

• Recruitment data starts to influence resource allocation
• TA managers use recruitment data to coach recruiters or redesign processes

Risks:

• Without clear communication, data still feels abstract to leaders
• Insights may not lead to action if change management is weak
• Reliance on individual TA leaders to upskill data storytelling skills

Next best steps:

1. Turn insights into stories. Pair a metric with a real-world example to humanise insight. Like: “Engineering time-to-hire has stretched to 106 days. We lost a candidate we really wanted last month after a 3-week interview lag. We need to streamline here.” 
2. Experiment deliberately. Choose one process tweak each quarter – shorter applications, a new sourcing channel, or a new interview structure, for example. Run it as an experiment, measure results, and share the outcomes. 
3. Align with business impact. Translate metrics into board-level outcomes. Faster hiring means fewer contractor costs; improved DEI means stronger employer reputation; better candidate experience means higher acceptance rates.
4. Start cross-functional collaboration. Connect recruitment data with other people metrics — like performance, retention, and engagement — to tell a joined-up story of how hiring impacts the whole employee lifecycle.
5. Start benchmarking externally. Compare your recruitment data against industry benchmarks. Are your time-to-hire, acceptance rates, or DEI outcomes ahead or behind the curve? Use external benchmarks to challenge assumptions and set realistic but ambitious goals.

Stage 4: Strategic 

We made 16 offers last month and hired 13 people. Our average time-to-hire was 72 days – driven-up by engineering roles which take 106 days because of delays at interview-to-offer. 

Engineering demand is likely to rise by 40% next quarter. If we keep our current interview process, we’ll face an average 120+ day time-to-hire, leaving engineering with ~25 roles unfilled, costing the business an average 500k in lost productivity, and threatening our next product release.

If we change assessment design, condense interview stages, and reallocate spend towards higher-ROI job boards, we can reduce that risk and protect revenue. 

What it looks like:

• • Data is embedded in decision-making across TA, HR, and leadership
  • Recruitment data powers experiments and continuous real-time evolution
  • Talent acquisition is moving towards predictive insights

• TA leaders are confident linking recruitment metrics to business outcomes 
• Business leaders actively seek TA’s input into workforce decision-making 

Risks:

• Over-reliance on dashboards, forgetting the human context behind numbers
• Risk of “black box” predictions if AI models aren’t transparent or explainable
• Potential to focus too much on optimisation without revisiting strategic goals

Next best steps:

1. Forecast demand with confidence. Use historic hiring patterns and market data to anticipate hard-to-fill roles and workforce gaps and plan proactively. Work with workforce planning to get early alignment.
2. Model scenarios for leaders. Create “what if” stories to help decision-makers see the impact of different decisions. Like: “If we reduce agency spend by 20%, we’ll need to boost referral programmes by 40% to maintain pipeline.”
3. Automate reporting packs. Set up automated board-ready dashboards and schedule sends. This builds consistency, reduces admin, and keeps leadership engaged with recruitment’s value.
4. Institutionalise continuous improvement. Bake data reviews into regular TA and leadership routines. End every quarter asking: What worked, what didn’t, what will we change? Build a culture where recruitment evolves in real-time.
5. Co-create KPIs with the business. Step into a role as a core business partner. Work with business leaders to define shared KPIs that link hiring directly to strategic goals. Like: “reduce unfilled sales roles by 20% to protect quarterly revenue.” Embed recruitment data into the heart of business performance.

Recruitment data isn’t numbers; it’s influence

When your data is connected and credible, you stop reacting and start leading – protecting productivity, reducing costs, strengthening DEI, improving candidate experience, and proving recruitment’s value as a strategic partner.

The unlock is choosing recruitment software that centralises your recruitment data, embeds reporting into your culture, and makes storytelling effortless. 

Start small, build consistency, and use those stories to shape decisions. With the right tools in place, recruitment data becomes your easiest win for strategic clout.

Tribepad is the trusted tech ally to smart(er) recruiters everywhere. Combining ATS, CRM, Video Interviewing, and Onboarding, our talent acquisition software is a springboard for fairer, faster, better recruitment for everyone.

Trusted by organisations like the Tesco, NHS Professionals, and Subway, 30-million people in 16 languages use Tribepad.